Been created L is a system that automates linking across multiple pages, although Google lists automation only as one of many sub-items. This discrepancy is absurd. Specific finger pointing does not make sense, but you can easily find SEO companies in the search engine that describe link exchange systems as dangerous and not worth implementing methods, and at the same time build a link profile of their company website (and customer websites) using the above-mentioned methods, unequivocally classified by Google as SWLe and as a violation of the guidelines, the same as linking automation.
If as an SEO industry - we want to start referring to Google's statements, it is worth starting by referring to Support.Google. This, of course, does not mean that you should abandon Mexico WhatsApp Number List the linking methods mentioned above. Their spawning is only a consequence of the fact that in the past and or today they are able to effectively change the order of search results. Google's policy here is motivated by a broadly defined, negative attitude to positioning, because marketing budgeting for SEO impoverishes the business model of a corporation based in % on revenues from Google Ads.
Why do SWLes affect the rest of what Google employees say? The same people are responsible for the subpage analyzed above, and above all, the same company with the same, very clear SEO policy. If in the basic guidelines it advises against methods that work - you need to be at least careful in interpreting all subsequent statements. Moz once gave four great universal interpretations: . Consider all the possibilities where the statement may be true but technically incorrect. . Allow some time for any corrections to appear, at least a few weeks. . over opinions and statements. . Be empathetic and forgiving. More. This can be reduced to two ways.